|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Racism
|
|
|
Question: Is it legal for industry to lobby the US government into enacting legislation that will make it more difficult for it's competitors to operate? Answer: Yes it is. This is not a new business practice either... at the turn of the century this country was involved in a railroad war. Successful rail operators were the ones that forced congressional leaders into voting for bills and referendums that were designed to stifle competition in any form, whether it be competing businesses or neighborhoods opposed to their construction and expansion plans. |
 |
Industries and state agencies regularly adopt pollution strategies that promise the path of least political resistance. The less political power a community possesses to defend itself, the more likely it is to suffer arduous environmental and health problems. This is an outcome that the 1987 United Church of Christ (UCC) report on toxic waste and race concluded was not due to mere coincidence, but rather the result of what then-project director Benjamin Chavis termed "environmental racism" Poor neighborhoods often lack the funds to send representatives and lobbyists to Washington in order to fight the plans of these large waste corporations, and so they often fall victim. |
|
Those who want to build subtitle D landfills and waste incinerator plants should pick a town with less than 25,000 people where residents are old, poor, politically conservative and Roman Catholic. That is the conclusion of a study commissioned by the California State Waste Management Board, which found people most likely to oppose such facilities are young or middle-aged, college-educated, liberal and Protestant. A $33,000 study was prepared by a Los Angeles public relations and political consulting firm. The study advises builders of waste incineration plants and landfills that they will face less opposition if they put the facility near poor neighborhoods instead of wealthy ones. This comes as no shock to environmental activists, because an estimated 4 out of every 5 blacks in this country have either a waste incinerator plant, a landfill, or both in their neighborhoods. "All socioeconomic groupings tend to resent the nearby siting of major waste disposal facilities, but the middle and upper socioeconomic strata possess better resources to effectuate their opposition," the report says. "Middle and higher socioeconomic strata neighborhoods should not fall at least within five miles of the proposed site." The report gives personality profiles of the most likely and least likely opponents of waste handling facilities, and suggests that trash incineration can be made more palatable by presenting it as part of a recycling program. The report outlines ways to defuse opposition. The report says waste-to-energy plant sites "can be suggested partly on the basis of neighborhoods least likely to express opposition-older, conservative and lower socioeconomic neighborhoods. Meanwhile the most likely opponents of a waste-to-energy project--residents in the vicinity, liberal, and higher-educated persons--can be targeted in a public participation program and public relations campaign." The report says the ideal site for a waste-to-energy plant would be in an industrial section far from homes and commercial activity but within the trash collection area that would be served. It says: "Commercial office spaces and residential lands that are at least within visual, hearing or smelling distance of the waste project will likely experience a decline in property values." Wil Baca, one of the leaders of the California Alliance in Defense of Residential Environments, which opposes trash incineration plants and landfills in populated areas, protested that the state Waste Management Board, in commissioning the study, sought to find out how "to deceive people, to sell them a product they don't want." It looks to us as if the ideas in this report are being applied across the country. Time after time, we see sites selected where people are poor or rural or both. Fortunately, we also see local people successfully fighting such plans, even making alliances across racial barriers. The fight against mass burn incinerators (and landfills) has become a powerful political force, forging new coalitions, strengthening American democracy in important ways. The 87-page report, entitled "Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting," was completed some years ago (but only came to light last year when the LOS ANGELES TIMES broke the story) Also Read: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|